Sting operation is designed to catch the person
committing a crime by means of deception. The word “sting” means set a trap to
catch a crook. It is an information gathering exercise; it looks for the facts,
“Every citizen strives for a corruption free society and must expose corruption
whenever it comes to his knowledge. He shall also try to remove corruption at
all levels of the State administration for better management of the State.Although there is no clear law which
specifically allows or legalizes sting operation, but the court derived the
right to conduct sting operation
under Article 51A (b) of the Constitution of
India.This particular Article imposes a duty upon the
citizens to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national
struggle for freedom.
Sting operation can be classified into two types
based on their purpose these are as follows:
1.
Positive sting operation
In positive sting operation society is benefited
because it makes government responsible and accountable. It leads to the
transparency in the government.
2.
Negative sting operation
In negative sting operations, it does not benefit
the society, but they do harm the society and its individuals. It unnecessarily
violates the privacy of the individual without any beneficial results to the
society.
POSITION OF
STING OPERATION IN INDIA:
In India till now we don’t have any direct provision
or law on sting operation which guides such operations. But person can go to
the court under different laws to protect his right. Wiretapping is a part of
sting operation which is regulated under Telegraph Act, 1885. Court also gives
the guideline for wiretapping by the government, which says that who can tap
the phone and etc. The government is required to show that the information
cannot be obtained through any other means and after that review committee
check the legality of each wiretape. . These sting operations also violates right to
privacy which according to the Supreme Court is guaranteed under Article 21-
right to life and personal liberty. As we are provide that the freedom of
expression guarantee in Article 19(1)(a) is not absolute therefore the
constitution provides with Article 19(2) which protects the public interest
morality and decency. A person who welcomes media interest in his life will not
be able to claim a right to privacy as easily as a ‘private individual.
LEGALITY OF
STING OPERATION IN INDIA:
Supreme
Court of India said that sting operation is not a legal method of law
enforcement, “A bench headed by Chief Justice P. Sathasivam said the apex court
had approved sting operation carried out in public interest in R.K. Anand case
but it will be difficult to understand the ratio in the said case as an
approval of such a method as an acceptable principle of law enforcement in all
cases.
Another
issue that arises from such an operation is the fact that the means deployed to
establish the commission of the crime itself involves a culpable act
It said
unlike the U.S. and certain other countries where a sting operation is
recognized as a legal method of law enforcement, though in a limited manner,
the same is not the position in India.
The bench said questions are raised on what would
be the position of such operations if conducted by a private individual who had
stained his own hands while entrapping what he considers to be the main crime
and the main offender.
No comments:
Post a Comment